Framework · Working definition
Observable indicators
Definition
An observable indicator describes a behavior an evaluator can look for in a specified task. Clear wording helps observers compare judgments, but agreement, relevance, and fairness still need to be checked in use.
Write something an observer can find
“Thinks strategically” leaves the observer to invent the standard. “Names a consequence for another team and incorporates it into the recommendation” identifies something to look for.
Even this needs context. Did the task create a relevant cross-team consequence? Was the information accessible? Did the person name it independently or after a prompt?
Avoid shortcuts in interpretation
A fast response is not automatically impulsive. A slow response is not automatically thoughtful. A person who asks no questions may already have the relevant information, or the task may have prevented questions.
Write down competing interpretations and the next observation that could distinguish them. “Not observed” should remain separate from “not capable.”
Compare observers
Have observers examine the same sample and explain their judgments. Use disagreement to clarify criteria and improve the task. Precise wording supports consistency; it does not guarantee it.
Build an evidence plan with an explicit section for what remains unknown.
This remains a working definition pending Mike's review of the framework wording.
Related concepts
- Core Abilities · Three ways of working through a decision: test the explanation, consider alternatives, and trace consequences.
Where this comes up
- Ready for what?
2 min read
Bring a real problem
What does your learning need to change?
A role people are struggling with. A decision that keeps going wrong. A capability you need to see before giving someone more responsibility. Start there.